Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Bell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 24, 1997No. 96-2254Published

1DissentSnell, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

What is rational? Is its meaning only in the eye of the beholder? Do its boundaries flex with the exigencies of the case before us? These questions naturally come from an examination of the constitutional requirements in assessing the legality of legislation. From that assessment, I conclude that “rational” is not a plastic concept that readily yields to individual predispositions. Rather, it is a firm guide that must be protected, rooted as it is in the Due Process Clauses of the United States and Iowa Constitutions.

In 1996 the Iowa legislature, in its laudable attempt…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Mathews v. LucasSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. People v. LindnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Glowacki v. State Board of Medical ExaminersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. People v. LawrenceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API