Legal Opinion

Sheridan v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 19, 1945No. 9970PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

Upon his trial in the district court for alleged violation of the National Stolen Property Act, U.S.C.A., Title 18, Sec. 415, Paul Davis Sheridan waived counsel proffered him by the trial court and chose to defend himself. He was convicted by the verdict of a jury and was sentenced by the district judge to concurrent terms of imprisonment of five years on each of the three counts of the indictment.

From the indictment and from the approved stipulated statement of evidence filed as a supplemental transcript of record, it appears that, on July 19, 1943, Sheridan obtained…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. KenofskeySupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Pines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. United States v. RiedelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
  5. United States v. LoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SheridanSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. LemonsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1946
  3. Clarke v. SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
  4. United States v. HopperDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1945
  5. Gutterman v. HiattDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API