Legal Opinion

Wiedeman v. Hedges

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1901No. 10,585PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the district court for Lancaster county. Tried below before Holmes, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

In the court below the defendant in error, plaintiff therein, began an action for the recovery of the value of certain material alleged to have been sold the defendant, plaintiff in error, under a verbal contract, to be used in the manufacture of certain machinery by the defendant and others associated with him, which material, at the defendant’s request, was furnished to the foreman engaged in the manufacture of such machinery. The answer was a general denial. Verdict and judgment were rendered against the defendant, and to secure the reversal thereof he prosecutes error in this court.

On the…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. H. J. Hughes Co. v. Farmers Union Produce Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Towner v. Western Contracting CorporationNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Donovan-McCormick Co. v. SparrMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Alberts v. PickardNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Acme Harvester Co. v. CurleeNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API