Legal Opinion
CLAYTON v. WELLS
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided March 30, 2024No. 1:22-cv-00908Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA GAIL H. CLAYTON and THOMAS A. ) CLAYTON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) 1:22CV908 v. ) ) ALEXANDER WELLS and ALLYSON P. ) WELLS, ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LORETTA C. BIGGS, District Judge. Before the Court are the following motions: (1) a Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 11), filed by Defendants Alexander and Alyson P. Wells (“the Wells”); (2) Cross-Motions for Rule 11 Sanctions filed by both Defendants, (ECF No. 18), and Plaintiffs Gail H. and Thomas A. Clayton (“the Claytons”), (ECF No. 28); and (3)…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.