Legal Opinion

Naumoff v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 25, 1983No. Docket Nos. 12859-81, 12860-81Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MARY HULL NAUMOFF, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent; ALEXANDER V. NAUMOFF, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Naumoff v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 12859-81, 12860-81.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1983-435; 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 364; 46 T.C.M. (CCH) 852; T.C.M. (RIA) 83435;

July 25, 1983.

Mitchell A. Naumoff, for the petitioners.

Grant A. Wolfe, and Jack E. Prestrud, for the respondent.

TIETJENS

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

TIETJENS, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in gift tax liability and additions to tax in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jack E. Golsen and Sylvia H. Golsen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  2. Fondren v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Commissioner v. DisstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Kieckhefer v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1951
  5. Stifel v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API