Legal Opinion · Dissent

Trapp v. Dykes

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1929No. 18827Published

1DissentAndrews, J.

I am unable to agree with the opinion in this case, and desire to express my reasons for my dissent thereto.

I agree with the law as announced in the first and second paragraphs of the syllabus and disagree with the law as announced in the third paragraph of the syllabus for two reasons: First, in my opinion, it is not a correct statement of the law; and second, the law announced has no application to the facts as shown by the record before this court.

The authority of the county commissioners is limited, and under the provisions of section 26, art. 10, of the Constitution no county shall be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Board of Cty. Comm. of Kay County v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Hall v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Wilson v. HorneckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Board of County Com'rs v. Eastern Oklahoma Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API