Legal Opinion

Myers v. Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1899No. 1,092PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Error to tlie Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.

1Opinion of the Court

THAYER, Circuit Judge.

In this case the Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company, the defendant in error, was charged with culpable negligence in maintaining an overhead bridge across its tracks at a street crossing, which was too low, as it is claimed, to permit brakemen, when on the top of freight, cars, to pass thereunder with ordinary safety. The bridge to which this charge relates was located in the city of Hudson, Wis., and the plaintiff’s husband, Edward Myers, who was a brakeman in the service of the defendant company, was knocked off from the top of one of its cars while…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gibson v. . Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
  2. Southern Pacific Co. v. SeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Devitt v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
  4. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co. v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
  5. Brossman v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. St. Louis Cordage Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Burch v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Dawson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API