Legal Opinion

Tate v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1998No. 72003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Movant appeals denial of Rule 24.035 post conviction relief -without an evidentiary hearing. His points on appeal contest: (1) whether the plea court had a sufficient factual basis to accept a guilty plea on the charge of stealing third offense, a class C felony; and, (2) whether the court honored the plea agreement. We affirm.

We summarily reject the contention the court did not have a factual basis to accept the guilty plea. Defendant informed the court that he “appropriated clothing in the possession of Famous-Barr without consent and with the purpose to deprive the victim…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Glasscock v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schuerenberg v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Myers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Myers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Wright-El v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API