Tate v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Judge.
Movant appeals denial of Rule 24.035 post conviction relief -without an evidentiary hearing. His points on appeal contest: (1) whether the plea court had a sufficient factual basis to accept a guilty plea on the charge of stealing third offense, a class C felony; and, (2) whether the court honored the plea agreement. We affirm.
We summarily reject the contention the court did not have a factual basis to accept the guilty plea. Defendant informed the court that he “appropriated clothing in the possession of Famous-Barr without consent and with the purpose to deprive the victim…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hamilton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Glasscock v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schuerenberg v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Myers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Myers v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Wright-El v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999