Legal Opinion
Pablo-Dejesus v. County of Multnomah
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 10, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01574Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON SAMUEL PABLO-DEJESUS, Case No. 3:19-cv-01574-SB Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants. BECKERMAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff Samuel Pablo-Dejesus (“Pablo-Dejesus”) filed this action against Multnomah County, John Does 1 to 5 (Multnomah County employees), and John Does 6 to 10 (Multnomah County supervisors) (together, “Defendants”). Pablo-Dejesus asserts failure to protect claims under the Fourteenth Amendment and a state law negligence claim. (Compl. ¶¶ 22-32.) The Court has…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- David M. Fink v. L. Shedler Susan Hubbard J. Valedez M. Jones T. Rosario D. Chefthaw Theo WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Denise Kay Anderson v. Woodcreek Venture Ltd James May Linda Brown Curtis BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Sage Redwind v. Western Union, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017