Legal Opinion
Ballas v. McKiernan
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided May 16, 1970PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSeymour Boyers, J.
These actions, consolidated solely for the purpose of the motion and cross motion for partial summary judgment herein essentially involve the claim of the plaintiff, Lodge No. 1894, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”) against three individual union members, Matthew McKiernan, John P. Carroll and Jose Antonio Colon (hereinafter referred to a “defendant-members”) for the collection of fines. The Union alleges that in accordance with its constitution and by-laws, it conducted hearings before its Union trial committees…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- National Labor Relations Board v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Railway Employes' Department v. HansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Lowe v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ballas v. McKiernanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Matter of Edwin R.New York Family Court · 1969
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local Union No. 17 v. LexoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1995
- Local 327, International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machines & Furniture Workers v. ProperNew York Supreme Court · 1991