Legal Opinion

Callahan v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1878PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the LaGrange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

An indictment was found against the appellant for seduction, the charging part of which was as follows : “ That Edmon Callahan, on the 18th day of November, A. D. 1877, at said county, feloniously had illicit intercourse with, and carnal knowledge of, Olive Crampton, a female of good repute for chastity and under the age of twenty-one years, by means of a promise of marriage to her previously made by the said Edmon Callahan.”

The sufficiency of the indictment was tested by motions to quash and in arrest of judgment. Plea, not guilty; trial and conviction.

• The indictment was based upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  2. Boyce v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Hotchkins v. HodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Stinehouse v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. KehoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. EcklerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
  3. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  4. People v. WeinstockNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1912
  5. Hinkle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API