Commonwealth v. Fulton
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceJustice Lamb
I join the majority in affirming the order of the Superior Court because the overwhelming evidence in this case makes the error of failing to call character witnesses harmless. In other respects, I join the reasoning of the dissent and write separately to emphasize the long-established rule that a criminal defendant may always present character evidence which is not “mere make-weight ... but it is positive evidence, and may of itself, by the creation of a reasonable doubt, produce an acquittal.” Commonwealth v. Cleary, 135 Pa. 64, 19 A. 1017, 1018 (1890). In Cleary, the error cited was a…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. ScottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States v. Alan James DringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Commonwealth v. WeissSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. ClearySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.