Legal Opinion

Miller v. Jackson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 11, 1940No. 13163PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Atkinson, Presiding Justice.

The rulings announced in the first and third headnotes do not require elaboration.

In Chason v. O’Neal, 158 Ga. 725, 730, 731, it was said: “While the purchasers at the sale of these lands, under the power of salo contained in the junior security deed, and under the deed executed in pursuance of such sale, acquired a title to these lands on May 22, 1923, did they obtain title to the crops then growing on these lands? Prior to the act of August 21, 1922 (Acts 1922, p. 114), which declares all crops, matured or unmatured, to be personalty, such purchasers would have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chason v. O'NealSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  2. Newton County v. BoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Griffin v. LeggettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Chatham Chemical Co. v. Vidalia Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1926

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  2. Adcock v. BerrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  3. Carney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  4. Chaffin v. ChaffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. King v. TilleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API