Morga v. Daniels
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 Ramon Morga, Case No. 2:21-cv-01743-APG-BNW 4 Petitioner v. Order 5 Charles Daniels, et al., [ECF No. 13] 6 Respondents 7 8 In this habeas corpus proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the respondents move to 9 dismiss four claims from petitioner Ramon Morga’s habeas first amended habeas petition. ECF 10 No. 13. The respondents argue that Grounds 1 through 4 are not cognizable in a federal habeas 11 proceeding. Alternatively, they argue that Grounds 2-4 are procedurally defaulted. I dismiss 12 Grounds 1, 2, and 3, but not 4. 13 Morga was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.