Legal Opinion
In re Bambury
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 2011PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent John James Bambury was admitted to practice law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on November 30, 1960. At all times relevant to this proceeding, the respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.
The Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) seeks an order disbarring the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (g) on the grounds that he has been suspended from the practice of law pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) and (iii), and has neither appeared nor applied to…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- In re KennedyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re RyansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re FletcherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re BenzingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
4Cited by15 opinions
- Matter of Yoo Rok JungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re BruzdziakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re BruzdziakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.