Legal Opinion

Chinette v. Conklin

California Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1895No. 19473PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application in the Supreme Court for a writ of prohibition to the Superior Court of Kern County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Application for a writ of prohibition. On the 19th of December, 1893, a petition in insolvency was filed in the superior court of Kern county by the firm of Pourry, Freres & Co., and on the same day the respondent made an order adjudging the said firm insolvent, and appointed a day on which to choose an assignee of their estate. In the schedules annexed to the petition the firm of Ardizzi & Olcese were named as creditors of the insolvent firm, and on the day fixed for choosing an assignee Olcese appeared and made proof of the claim of said firm, and by his evidence alone an assignee of the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diggins v. HartshorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. In Re Fox West Coast TheatresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
  3. In re ChopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API