Legal Opinion

Najewitz v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1944No. 29333PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered on an order sustaining a demurrer to the amended complaint. The appellant conceives that his alleged cause of action is based upon a contract of employment with the city, and the amended complaint is replete with allegations, by way of inducement and conclusion, upon that theory.

We think, however, the ultimate facts pleaded present quite a different cause of action. The allegations of the amended complaint are, in substance, as follows:

The city owned and operated a gravel pit in the vicinity of Juanita Bay on Lake Washington; that there…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hockersmith v. FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Morris v. Healy Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Clarke v. Yukon Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Winkenwerder v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Penn-Ohio Steel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. SSG Corp. v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  4. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hansen & Rowland Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  5. Hammerbeck v. HubbardWashington Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API