Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vecchio v. Kelly

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 17, 2012Published

1DissentSweeny, J.

I agree with the majority that the Commissioner failed to establish by substantial evidence specifications 6 and 10 (leaving work early and falsifying business records). I also agree that the matter must be remanded for a determination of the appropriate penalty on the remaining specifications.

I must disagree, however, with the additional direction of the majority that, regardless of the penalty to be imposed, even if the Commissioner still sees fit to order termination, he must grant petitioner the right to apply for a vested interest retirement.

The law is clear that in our review of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kelly v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Harp v. New York City Police DepartmentNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Harp v. New York City Police DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API