Legal Opinion

Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n v. Tampa Bay Downs, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 5, 2007No. 03-16272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This case arises out of a dispute between Gulfstream Park Racing Association (“Gulfstream”) and Tampa Bay Downs, Inc. (“Tampa Bay Downs”) over the enforceability of certain contracts under Florida’s Pari-Mutuel Wagering Act (the ‘Wagering Act”). Because we found that this was an unsettled question of distinct importance to the State of Florida in its efforts to regulate the gambling industry, and because the Wagering Act is part of a complex and extensive regulatory scheme governing the gambling industry in the State of Florida, we certified the following question to the Florida Supreme Court:

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. P. David Bailey v. Allgas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  2. GULFSTREAM PARK RACING v. Tampa Bay DownsSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  3. Thomas v. RatinerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n, Inc. v. Tampa Bay Downs, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McWane, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Monarch Content Management LLC v. Arizona Department of GamingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Gulf States Reorganization Group, Inc. v. Nucor Corp.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2011
  4. Hall v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2010
  5. Churchill Downs Tech. Initiatives Co. v. Mich. Gaming Control Bd.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API