Rogers-Farmer Metro Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannell, Judge.
Under the undisputed facts shown on motion for summary judgment, this case is controlled adversely to the appellee by the decisions in Holbrook v. Capital Auto. Co., 111 Ga. App. 601 (142 SE2d 288); Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co., 65 Ga. App. 727, 731 (16 SE2d 176); Butts v. Groover, 66 Ga. App. 20 (16 SE2d 894). The purchase order, signed by appellee, after the alleged fraudulent misrepresentation as to mileage was made, reads in part as follows: "Buyer acknowledges he has read and received a printed copy of this order comprising the entire agreement affecting this purchase. . .…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Holbrook v. Capital Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Holbrook v. Capital Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Butts v. GrooverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
3Cited by9 opinions
- City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- City Dodge, Inc. v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Kot v. Richard P. Rita Personnel System International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Jain v. Carload Delivery Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Andrews Motors Co. v. ClementCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.