Legal Opinion

Tharp v. Edmiston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 28, 1932No. 32093PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

James H. Tharp foreclosed certain mortgages granted by S. Y. Edmiston, and at the foreclosure sale became the purchaser of the mortgaged properties. Tharp, the adjudicatee, then took a rule on W. P. Hickey, recorder of mortgages for the parish of Orleans, requiring him to show cause why he should not erase from the records of his office the inscriptions of eight alleged junior mortgages bearing against the properties sold in the foreclosure proceeding. Plaintiff in rule also asked “that the bidders (meaning, we take it, the holders) of said encumbrances and the Civil Sheriff be made parties”…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Savage v. HolmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1860
  2. Cappel v. HundleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Calcasieu Building & Loan Ass'n v. GoudeauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Succession of BurgSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Carrere v. ReddixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
  4. Carrere v. ReddixSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  5. State Ex Rel. Lucas v. Hickey.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API