Legal Opinion
Booth v. Cebula
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided April 13, 1960No. Gen. 47,789PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kiley
This is a personal injury action by a tenant against owners of a building. The answer relied on an exculpatory clause in the lease and defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted. Judgment was entered accordingly and plaintiff has appealed.
The suit was filed January 19, 1956; the answer was filed February 6, 1956; and the part of the answer containing the exculpatory clause was stricken February 10, 1956. Our Supreme Court on January 22, 1959, denied rehearing in O’Callaghan v. Waller & Beckwith Realty Co., 15 Ill.2d 436. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, based on O’Callaghan,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Knox v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Manigault v. SpringsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- People Ex Rel. Eitel v. LindheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mayfair Fabrics v. HenleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967
- Harraz v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- Rigger v. Baltimore CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Easson v. WAGNER SD 349South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Link v. Venture Stores, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.