Legal Opinion

People v. DeFreitas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 14, 1995PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Rosenblatt, J. P.

In the case before us, we are called upon to weigh the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. We hold that he was provided with meaningful representation. In so holding, we reject any suggestion that the defendant’s attorney, in order to fulfill that standard, was obligated to present defenses or to make assertions that in the case before us would have been baseless, spurious, or unethical.

I

The proof established that the police interrupted the defendant while he was committing an armed robbery at a jewelry store in Hewlett (Nassau…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. MantillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. People v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. Lasso-ReinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API