Legal Opinion

Mickles v. Atlantic Brokerage Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 7, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hubbs, P. J.:

The plaintiffs are copartners engaged in the wholesale and retail grocery business. The defendant is a corporation acting as a fruit broker. This action is to recover the damages suffered by the plaintiffs because of the defendant’s breach of an implied warranty.

Plaintiffs allege that the defendant, acting through Richard Schuetze, its general manager, represented to them that it had authority to sell two cars of California grapes; that the plaintiffs purchased the grapes, relying upon the defendant’s authority to sell them upon the terms stated; that the defendant did not have…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. . MadisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  2. Baltzen v. . NicolayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. De Persia v. Merchants Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  2. Weiss v. BaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Fuller v. MelkoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  4. Murray Oil Products Co. v. Poons Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1947
  5. Asch v. M. Levy & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API