Legal Opinion

Mank v. Hendrickson

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 24, 1967No. Nos. 946, 947PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALDEN, Chief Justice.

A county judge was disqualified for prejudice and prohibited from presiding over the cases wherein appellees were charged with a misdemeanor. This was accomplished by a writ of prohibition emanating from a circuit court. The county judge appeals. We affirm.

A change of judge in a criminal case on account of prejudice is obtained by following the procedures found in F.S.A. § 911.01. Thereunder, defendants are required to file their affidavits alleging fear that a fair trial cannot be had on account of *575the judge’s prejudice. The facts and reasons for such belief must be…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Davis v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  2. State Ex Rel. Brown v. DewellSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Dickenson v. ParksSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Stevens v. Tampa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. State Ex Rel. La Russa v. HimesSupreme Court of Florida · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eason v. ColbathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Ball v. PappDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Shelton v. SepeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  4. Orlando Sports Stadium, Inc. v. Sentinel Star Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. Turner v. CooperDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API