Legal Opinion

United States v. Motto

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided November 9, 1999No. CRIM. 99-297PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DALZELL, District Judge.

On June 9, 1999, defendant Paul Motto pleaded guilty to distributing visual depictions of minors engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and receipt of visual depictions of minors engaged in such conduct, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(1) and (a)(2), respectively. At his sentencing hearing which commenced on October 21, 1999 and concluded today, Motto contended that we should depart downward from the 70 — 87 month sentencing range because America Online (“AOL”) “enabled” the offense and, pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13, he suffered a “significantly reduced…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. John G. Bennett, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  4. American Civil Liberties Union v. RenoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. United States v. Albert Sally, A/K/A "Pj" Albert SallyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LesterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. United States v. LongDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
  3. United States v. MezvinskyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Ballard v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2020
  5. Miller v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API