Legal Opinion

Galliano v. United States Postal Service

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 21, 1986No. Civ. A. 85-2515PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN H. PRATT, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, the Congressional Majority Committee, Inc. (CMC), an independent political action committee, its chairman, Ralph Galliano, and Americans for Phil Gramm in ’84 (APG-84), an independent project of CMC, seek judicial review of two orders issued by the Postal Service pursuant to the postal false representations statute, 39 U.S.C. § 3005. These orders were based on a finding that plaintiffs were soliciting political contributions through the mail by means of materially false representations. Cease and Desist Order No. CD-305 instructs the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Ex Parte JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. United States v. BallardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. United States Postal Service v. Council of Greenburgh Civic AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Blount v. RizziSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pitney Bowes Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. Ralph J. Galliano v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API