Venet v. Garcia
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Appellants seek review of an order of the trial court granting a new trial on the grounds that final argument to the jury by defendants’ counsel was so improper and prejudicial that as a result thereof plaintiff was denied a fair trial.
Appellants urge reversal of the order granting a new trial and that the final judgment entered upon the jury verdict be reinstated.
Trial judges are vested with broad discretion in granting new trials, and appellate courts will not reverse an order granting new trial absent a clear abuse of that discretion. Cloud v. Fallís, 110 So.2d 669 (Fla.1959); Weems v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Erie Ins. Co. v. BushyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Eastern SS Lines, Inc. v. MartialDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Weems v. DawsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Martin v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Canal Insurance Co. v. SusmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985