Legal Opinion
McClelland v. Braverman Kaskey & Caprara, P.C. (In Re McClelland)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 14, 2005No. 18-36796PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REQUEST OF BRAVERMAN KASKEY & CAPRARA, P.C., BRAVERMAN DANIELS KASKEY LTD., DAVID L. BRAVERMAN AND RICHARD E. MILLER FOR JURY TRIAL
CECELIA G. MORRIS, Bankruptcy Judge.
By memorandum decision dated July 26, 2005 (ECF Docket No. 244), the Court determined that the Debtor’s objection to the claims of Debtor’s pre-petition attorneys, Braverman Kaskey & Caprara, P.C., Braverman Daniels Kaskey Ltd., and John E. Kaskey (collectively, the “Claimants”) and the counterclaims asserted by the Debtor as part of Debtor’s objection to those claims are core proceedings. Part of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Langenkamp v. CulpSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thomas M. Germain, Trustee for the Estate of O'sullivan's Fuel Oil Co., Inc. v. The Connecticut National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Billing v. Ravin, Greenberg & Zackin, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Ernst & Young & Ernst & Young, LLP v. Bankruptcy Services, Inc. (In Re CBI Holding Co.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. v. Communications Network International, Ltd. (In Re WorldCom, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007