Legal Opinion

Doten v. Plymouth Division of the Probate & Family Court Department

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 10, 1985PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff also maintains that he will be prejudiced by appearing before the judge in any other proceeding related to this divorce case that might occur in the future. The single justice did not agree, however, and his disposition of matters on a petition for relief pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. See, e.g., Palaza v. Superior Court, 393 Mass. 1001, 1002 (1984); Commonwealth v. Yelle, 390 Mass. 678, 686 (1984). The plaintiff has failed to establish that the single justice has abused his discretion in this case by denying the claims for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Albert v. Municipal Court of the City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. YelleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. Palaza v. Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bloise v. BloiseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Myrick v. Superior Court DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2018
  3. Picciotto v. Chief Justice of the Superior CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  4. Picciotto v. Superior Court Department of the Trial CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. Culley v. CatoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API