Legal Opinion

Madlener v. Finley

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1989No. 66105PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Clark

This case raises the issue of whether a clerk of court who holds a litigant’s funds pursuant to a court order pending resolution of the litigation has a duty to deposit those funds in an interest-bearing account.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. In 1981, appellee, Mary S. Madlener, was named a defendant in an interpleader action filed by an insurance company. The court in the case ordered the insurance company to deposit the amount of its admitted liability with appellant, Morgan M. Finley, the clerk of the circuit court of Cook County (the Clerk). Because the court did not specify…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lakefront Realty Corp. v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. City of Chicago Ex Rel. Cohen v. KeaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. SavaianoIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
  4. People v. McGrathIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Gonzalez v. DanaherAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gross v. Town of Cicero, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
  2. People v. GreverIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Turnipseed v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. Mannix v. DonnewaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Clarence Gross v. Town of CiceroCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API