Legal Opinion
Subscribers at Casualty Reciprocal Exchange Ex Rel. Dodson v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 2, 1936PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
The plaintiff is a reciprocal insurance exchange. On October 24, 1930, it issued its policy of insurance with a $50 deductible clause to one of its members or subscribers, Raymond Teall, against damage by collision to a Stutz automobile owned by Teall.
On April 2, 1931, while said policy was in effect, said automobile was damaged by a collision with a street ear claimed to have been negligently operated by defendant at the intersection of Thirtieth and Main Streets in Kansas City, Missouri. The amount of damage to the automobile is charged in the petition to have been $617.55. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Matthews v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
- Loewenstein v. Queen InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- McKenzie v. Missouri Stables, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Burnett v. CrandallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- State Ex Rel. Park National Bank v. Globe Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- General Exchange Ins. Corp. v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1948
- Borserine v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Calvert Fire Ins. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Lubrication Engineers, Inc. v. ParkinsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Korte Construction Co. v. Deaconess Manor Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.