Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. De Forest
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 12, 1926No. 390Published
1Opinion of the Court
13 F.2d 438 (1926)
ARMSTRONG et al.
v.
DE FOREST et al.
No. 390.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 12, 1926.
Thomas Ewing, Drury W. Cooper, and John C. Kerr, all of New York City, for appellants.
Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Samuel E. Darby, of New York City, for appellee De Forest.
Harry E. Knight and Clifton V. Edwards, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., for the Secretary of the Navy and Alexander Meissner.
Before HOUGH, MANTON and HAND, Circuit Judges.
HOUGH, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
The present argument for plaintiffs has two parts, viz.: (1) If the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Butterworth v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Freeman v. AldersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.