Legal Opinion

Daitch Crystal Dairies, Inc. v. Neisloss

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1959PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Groat, J.

The plaintiff is a tenant of the defendants Benjamin Braunstein, Harry Neisloss, and Benjamin Neisloss doing business under the firm name and style of B-H-B Associates, herein called B-H-B. The defendant Dilhert Quality Super-Markets, Inc., herein called Dilhert, is also a tenant of B-H-B. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin B-H-B from filing plans for, and the construction of, a supermarket building on certain land leased by B-H-B under a ground lease on the west side of Union Street between 31 Road and 28 Avenue, Flushing, New York, and to enjoin and restrain Dilhert from conducting, operating or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Kirke La Shelle Co. v. Paul Armstrong Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933
  3. Gillet v. . Bank of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. William C. Atwater & Co. v. Panama RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  5. Grossman v. . SchenkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker v. the Lewis Grocery Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Crest Commercial, Inc. v. Union-Hall, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  3. Daitch Crystal Dairies, Inc. v. NeislossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
  4. Edmond's of Fresno v. MacDonald Group, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Great A. & P. Tea Co. v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API