Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 20, 1893No. 696Published

No statement of the case necessary.

1Opinion

In support of the proposition contained in Judge DAVIDSON'S opinion, that under proper indictment the accused can (on the same trial) be convicted for each day's violation of the statute, I submit the following authorities: 1 Bish. Crim. Proc., sec. 452; Kane v. The People, 8 Wend., 203; Commonwealth v. McChord, 2 Dana, 242; Stone v. The State, 20 N.J. Law, 404; The People v. Costello, 1 Denio, 83; The People v. Gates, 13 Wend., 311; The State v. Kibby, 7 Mo., 317; United States v. O'Callahan, 6 McLean, 596; Orr v. The State, 18 Ark. 540; Covy v. The State, 4 Port. (Ala.), 186; The State v.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kane v. PeopleCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
  2. People v. CostelloCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
  3. People v. GatesNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  4. Mullinix v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. State v. CroteauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1849

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API