Hallamore Corp. v. Capco Steel Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
At Wilmington this 30th day of June, 2009, having considered Hallamore Corporation’s (“plaintiff’) pending motion to compel non-party AmQuip Crane Rental, LLC to respond to a subpoena by attending a deposition and by producing documents pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45;
IT IS ORDERED that said motion (D.1.1) is denied and said subpoena is deemed invalid, for the reasons that follow:
1. Introduction. Hallamore Corporation (“Hallamore”) has filed a motion to compel a non-party, AmQuip Crane Rental, LLC (“AmQuip”), to respond to a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Echostar Communications Corp. v. News Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
- Kupritz v. Savannah College of Art & DesignDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beresford v. Doe(s)Superior Court of Delaware · 2019
- COOK v. U.S. XPRESS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- In re Application of Vestolit GmbH and Celanese Europe B.V.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025