State v. Hill
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.
This appeal arises from the denial of relief to defendant-appellant, William G. Hill, under the Post Conviction Act (Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 29-3001 et seq. (Reissue 1979)). He seeks to set aside and vacate his prior conviction and to withdraw his plea in order that he may plead anew. We find the appeal to be utterly without merit and legally frivolous; the order of the trial court is affirmed.
Defendant sets forth five purported assignments of error which condense into the claim that his trial counsel had not prepared for trial and was therefore ineffective, as a consequence of which defendant’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State v. OppermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Marteney v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WattsNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. OteyNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. ColemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. KonfrstNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. JoubertNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. FilkinNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.