Legal Opinion

In re Tax Appeal of BHCMC

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 29, 2017No. 112911Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,911 In the Matter of the Appeal of BHCMC, L.L.C., d/b/a BOOT HILL CASINO & RESORT. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under K.S.A. 2016 Supp. 79-3702(c), to "use" property a taxpayer must "exercise within this state . . . any right or power over tangible personal property incident to the ownership of that property." This language is ambiguous. It may or may not require that the user or taxpayer be the owner. This ambiguity must be read to favor the taxpayer. In addition, the taxpayer must have exercised a right or power incident to ownership of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ullery v. OthickSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  2. State v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. In Re Tax Exemption Application of Central Illinois Public Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. State Ex Rel. Six v. Kansas LotterySupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. General Motors Corp. v. State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API