Stroud Motor Mfg. Co. v. Gunzer

As appellee . says, regarding appellant’s statement of the case, that it is “in its main essentials” correct, we copy it, as follows:

“On January 17, 1922, nine plaintiffs joined together in one suit against five defendants in the district court of Sutton county. The nine plaintiffs alleged nine separate causes of action in the same suit and petition, alleging in substance that each one of the nine plaintiffs had subscribed -for stock in a common-law trust or copartnership known as the Stroud Motor Manufacturing Association, the subscriptions being made on different days and for different…