Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. Byram
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
25 Cal.2d 353 (1944)
UNIVERSAL CONSOLIDATED OIL COMPANY (a Corporation), Respondent,
v.
H. L. BYRAM, as County Tax Collector, etc., Appellant.
L. A. No. 18121.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Dec. 5, 1944.
J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, S. V. O. Prichard, Assistant County Counsel, and A. Curtis Smith and Gordon Boller, Deputies County Counsel, for Appellant.
Faries & McDowell, Holbrook & Tarr, C. E. McDowell and W. Sumner Holbrook, Jr., for Respondents.
CURTIS, J.
Universal Consolidated Oil Company and Long Beach Harbor Oil Company duly filed with the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Traynor; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Carter.
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Clyde Mattox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Patterson v. Colorado Ex Rel. Attorney General of Colo.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.