Biglow v. Biglow
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Harriet Biglow and Louisa Wooster, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Clinton on the 18th day of July, 1898, upon the report of a referee, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal an •order made at the Clinton Trial Term, bearing date the 14th day of April, 1898, and entered in said clerk’s office, referring the issues in, the…
Read the full summary
Appeal by the defendants, Harriet Biglow and Louisa Wooster, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Clinton on the 18th day of July, 1898, upon the report of a referee, with notice of an intention to bring up for review upon such appeal an •order made at the Clinton Trial Term, bearing date the 14th day of April, 1898, and entered in said clerk’s office, referring the issues in, the case to a referee to hear and determine. In the complaint it is alleged that the plaintiff and the defendant John 0.…
1Opinion of the Court
Mebwie, J.:
It is conceded that, on the 20th of April, 1866, Angelina Moore-became the owner of the property in question, consisting of a house and a small lot. At that date, she, with her husband, Samuel M. Moore, conveyed the same by warranty deed to John O. Biglow and Joseph Biglow. The plaintiff was the wife of Joseph Biglow, and claims to have acquired his interest in the property by virtue of a deed from him to F. H. Murray, under date of March 19, 1867,. witnessed, but not acknowledged or recorded, and a deed from Murray to the plaintiff, March 15, 1892. Joseph Biglow died in 1896. Some…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The People v. . SnyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Weston v. . StoddardNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Whiting v. . EdmundsNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Arents v. . Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Best v. ZehNew York Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Satterlee v. . KobbeNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Drake v. DrakeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Bender v. TerwilligerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Delcambre v. . DelcambreNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Ewers v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.