Legal Opinion

Hinkel v. Crowson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1922No. S. F. No. 9321Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion

THE COURT.

In a petition for rehearing the respondent refers to the statement in the opinion heretofore filed, in discussing the possibility of obtaining letters of administration upon the estate of the deceased wife of the appellant, that, “the homestead was her property and was a part of her estate at the time of her death,” and claims that this statement is contrary to previous decisions of this court, referring to Matter of Tracey, 136 Cal. 385 [69 Pac. 20], Estate of Shirey, 167 Cal. 193 [138 Pac. 994] , Saddlemire v. Stockton etc. Soc., 144 Cal. 653 [79 Pac. 381], Estate of Beer, 178…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of SimontonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Saddlemire v. Stockton Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Matter of TraceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. In Re the Estate of ShireyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Goodrum v. SelinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API