Legal Opinion

Waznitski v. George B. Limbert & Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 1918No. 9,417PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Lake Superior Court; Walter Hardy, Judge. Action by Kashmir Waznitski against Geqrge B. Limbert and Company. From a judgment for defendant, tbe plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.

— Tbis is an action for personal injuries alleged to have been received by appellant while in tbe employ of appellee. At tbe close of plaintiff’s evidence, and over bis objection and exception at tbe request of appellee, tbe court instructed tbe jury to return a verdict for tbe defendant, which it did. Tbe only question in this appeal, presented in different forms, is: Did tbe court err in directing a verdict for tbe defendant?

Tbis action was prosecuted under tbe Employers’ Liability Act of 1911 (Acts 1911 p. 145, §8020a et seq. Burns 1914.) Before proceeding to a discussion of tbe main…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lyons v. City of New AlbanyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ochs v. M. J. Carnahan Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. CallahanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Evansville Gas & Electric Light Co. v. RobertsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  5. Barker v. Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. George B. Limbert & Co. v. WaznitskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Blackstone Theatre Corp. v. Goldwyn Distributing Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Smith, Rec. v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API