Legal Opinion

Norton v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1952No. 35,625Published

1Opinion

Upon Petition for Rehearing.

On April 18, 1952, the following opinion was filed:

2Per curiam

Defendant Anselmo has petitioned for rehearing on the ground that this court failed to pass upon his contention that defendants Nelson were negligent as a matter of law and that the trial court erred in not instructing the jury accordingly.

*245These questions were not properly presented by defendant Anselmo’s assignments of error. See, 1 Dunnell, Dig. & Supp. § 363. Moreover, since the jury found defendants Nelson negligent, and since plaintiff and defendants Nelson, not having appealed, apparently are satisfied with…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merrill v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Bunge v. YagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Olson v. NeubauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. McGillivray v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Erickson v. Northland Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API