Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Seymoure

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 15, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action of tort for property damage resulting from the collision of the plaintiffs motor vehicle with that of the defendant. The parties reside in this Commonwealth; the accident occurred here; and both vehicles were insured under the provisions of G. L. c. 90, § 340, introduced by St. 1971, c. 978, § 1 (effective January 1, 1972) as amended by St. 1971, c. 1079, §§ 2 and 3. Under the statute each insured owner is exempt from tort liability for damage to the other’s vehicle. The trial court sustained the defendant’s “plea in abatement” based upon this statutory exemption. The case…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lolos v. BerlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1958
  2. White v. E. T. Slattery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. Lee v. Allied Sports Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  4. Hacker v. BeckMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Summers v. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Okoli v. OkoliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  2. Tsomides v. TsomidesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  3. Potts v. Transamerica Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API