Legal Opinion

State v. McRoberts

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1988No. 17142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Cheryl McRoberts stands convicted of forgery. She now appeals from a district court order denying her motion for production, at public expense, of a transcript of her sentencing Rearing. Having forgone a direct appeal from her judgment of conviction, McRoberts planned to use the transcript in preparing an application for post-conviction relief. The district judge held that he lacked authority to order a transcript at public expense until McRoberts actually filed an application. Although we agree with this ruling, it presents an overlapping issue concerning the appealability…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MacCollomSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. DrozdCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  3. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. State v. AdamsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API