Legal Opinion

Ratti v. Hinsdale Raceway

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 31, 1969No. 5765PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff, a resident of Vermont, in a petition for declaratory judgment (RSA 491:22) seeks a determination that the statute (RSA 284:3) which compels a licensed race track to employ at least eighty-five per cent of its employees from New Hampshire residents is discriminatory and unconstitutional. Research has not disclosed that the factual situation of this case has been litigated in any other jurisdiction. The statute reads as follows: “Employees. At least eighty-five per cent of the persons employed by a person, association, or corporation conducting a racing plant under the provisions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Toomer v. WitsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Edwards v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Landers v. Eastern Racing Association, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Geraldine C. Medina v. Warren B. RudmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
  2. Kansas Racing Management, Inc. v. Kansas Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. Donnelly v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  4. Fraternal Order of Police Youngstown Lodge No. 28 v. HunterOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. David P. Eby & a. v. State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API