Ketcham v. Rowland & Shafto, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the City Court of the city of Hew York denying the motion of the plaintiff to vacate an order for his' examination before trial.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiff alleges that, in May, 1910, the sum of $600 due to him upon a participation agreement then owned and held by him in a certain mortgage was paid to the defendants for the plaintiff’s account and wrongfully converted by them. The answer of the defendant Johnson is somewhat inartistically drawn, and in a single separate defense he apparently seeks to set up, first, that the plaintiff is not the real party in interest, and also that the defendants obtained the money and expended it under the directions of one Adam Frank, the real owner. The defendant Johnson has obtained an order…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Alden v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Bock v. BockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- Klein v. Carey Printing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1923