Legal Opinion
Estate of Marjorie C. Thurman v. Dodaro
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided January 4, 1984No. 67338PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Victor Dodaro brought a pro se suit against the estate of Ms. Thurman, seeking to recover $2,750 of a retainer for legal services. He claims he contracted with her to represent him at a parole hearing in February 1982 and to pursue all necessary appeals if he was denied parole, and that he paid her $4,250 in advance for these services. The parole hearing was postponed until April, and his application was denied. In May appellee was informed, by a letter from Valerie Belmont dated May 19,1983, of Ms. Thurman’s death. Dodaro filed a pro se lawsuit seeking to recover the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pickett v. PaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Robinson v. BomarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Tyree v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Thompson v. LagerquistSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
- Headrick v. FordhamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hap Farms, Inc. v. HeardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Anderson v. BruceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Stone Mountain Aviation, Inc. v. Rollins Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Jones v. IsomCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- William Crispin v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2021