Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Marshall

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1980No. 14788PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Justice:

This appeal involves the validity of a real estate and stock transfer between a husband and wife. The transfer was part of an alleged oral reconciliation agreement made between the parties in September of 1970. The trial court found that the husband, the appellee, had met his burden of proof in showing that his former wife, the appellant, had voluntarily conveyed the property to him. The wife urges that the ruling is erroneous in that the record shows that the husband violated his fiduciary duty to her and did not meet the statutory burden of showing the transfer lawful. W.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Kulchar v. KulcharCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Peyton v. William C. Peyton Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
  3. Eubanks v. EubanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Victor M. Francois v. A. Jane Francois, George H. Adams and William H. Dick, D/B/A Ad'm Enterprises, a Limited Partnership. Appeal of A. Jane FrancoisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  5. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of Missouri · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Burnside v. BurnsideWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. LaRue v. LaRueWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Levine v. LevineNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Charlton v. CharltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gangopadhyay v. GangopadhyayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API